Case Study: Garvin Industries

02.20.2012

Garvin Industries is a 120-year-old family owned manufacturer of UL Listed electrical, low voltage and lighting products. Their products include steel boxes, covers and device rings, fittings, weatherproof boxes and covers, hangers, straps, fasteners and clamps, devices and wallplates, tools and installation accessories. Garvin Industries also has the ability to customize standard electrical products upon request. The company features plants in the United States, China, India and Mexico, and has become recognized for designing innovative, labor-saving products and will custom design and manufacture products to meet specifications.

Challenge:

Bart Garvin, the President and CEO of Garvin Industries had attended a supplier meeting held by one of their largest clients. During this meeting, their client suggested to their suppliers there was more that could be done to improve their overall relationship. The main concern was how to improve communication between the suppliers and more than 700 local branch offices that often purchased products from suppliers independently.

Garvin Industries wanted to develop a plan to directly and individually reach out to each these local branches. However, they did not have the internal resources to do so.

Process

Rich Burghgraef, president and CEO of Randolph Sterling, Inc. met with Garvin Industries’ executive team to discuss this issue and how to achieve their goal. Garvin had a list of all of the branch offices, however, the list was unclear as to who the decision maker or decision makers were in each office. They wanted to obtain the phone numbers and e-mail addresses for those they should communicate with, as well as find out their preferred method of communication (i.e. weekly e-mail or phone calls).

Garvin quickly realized this relatively simple project was a larger problem than anticipated. As their team of six to seven associates began the process, they discovered calls being made to the smaller, local offices were redirected to a larger office if a phone call to a specific person was not answered. The challenge was getting the information they needed because although they may call three different people at three different branches, each of these calls could be transferred to the same larger office where someone was available to answer it.

The Randolph Sterling sales team met this challenge and did more than just ask for information. They developed relationships with the local contacts of Garvin’s client. The team handled the calls in a professional manner, so the people they reached several times were not only understanding, but became more and more helpful by providing the contact information of people in the location they were trying to reach, even if it wasn’t the office they called.

There were also locations that provided individuals’ e-mail addresses. As they continued the process, they realized using e-mail became a direct way to reach out to these contacts and reduce the number of calls being redirected to another office miles away. Thus Randolph Sterling found Garvin a better way to communicate with the local decision makers of their client. Having the e-mail information also allowed Garvin to track local decision makers who would visit their web site, looking for items or to purchase.

Through their effort, Randolph Sterling’s sales team conducted good conversations with those who were willing to share information because they did not come across as trying to sell something. Because the goal was communicated well, the team obtained the information they needed for all 700+ offices.

Result

The process became a win-win for Garvin Industries and their client. Garvin listened to their client who said, “We need to communicate better.” They quickly acted upon their client’s suggestion which ended up being a great benefit to Garvin. From their client’s standpoint, it helped them get information into one of their major client’s hands more frequently and turn that into more business.

Rich said, “This is a simple process of we have what they want. They do X amount of business with us. We can turn that into Y amount of business just by having better communication.”

There are areas the relationship can still grow by continuing to improve communication lines with their cleients offices. Already it is becoming easier for Garvin to be able to put together a weekly special they can send to their client’s offices offering something they may need instead of having to call 700 offices.

The end result, Rich said, was using the right communication methods and this resulting in more business. This was important for everyone involved!

Case Study: BtB Marketing Communications

11.21.2011

Case Study: BtB Marketing Communications

BtB Marketing Communications is a full-service business-to-business marketing communications firm.  BtB provides media planning and buying, creative tradeshow design, website development, interactive marketing and much more!

Challenge

In business for more than 20 years, BtB Marketing Communications is proud to say that a majority of their new business comes from referrals. As we all know, we cannot count on referrals for 100% of our business, so just like most companies, BtB has always used inside sales professionals to keep the flow of business coming in. In 2009, when one of their internal inside sales professionals who handled much of the new business efforts for BtB decided to move on in her career, BtB was faced with the question as to continue this position internally or outsource it externally.

BtB knew they wanted a more disciplined and organized process of funneling a wide range of business leads into solid leads. Although they knew who they needed to target and where to find those leads, they also knew the reality of keeping this role internal would be a challenge due to employee time restraints as they focus on current clients as well as potential leads. They called Randolph Sterling, Inc. to discuss the process further.

BtB decided to take this opportunity to try a new approach and use the outside services of Randolph Sterling to focus primarily on funneling in new, solid leads for the sales team at BtB.

Process
Rich Burghgraef, President and CEO of Randolph Sterling, Inc. sat down with the executive staff at BtB to get a better understanding of their business and goals and explained the outsourced sales solutions that Randolph Sterling could provide to BtB’s targeted accounts.

The staff at BtB and Randolph Sterling worked together to come up with a plan to organize the vast number of potential prospects that came in through marketing efforts and research. Together, they created a working prospect matrix.

The Randolph Sterling inside sales professional working on the BtB account first learns the different aspects of BtB’s business so they are able to give an intelligent description of the business and its offerings. The Randolph Sterling team member then takes the wide range of potentially causal contacts and does the nitty gritty of calling on the phone, drilling down the company’s internal phone system to get to the right person, collect as much information about that person as they can and establish a connection with a good solid lead to then introduce to BtB’s services.

Result

The end result is establishing a connection directly with a sales team member of BtB, generating a solid lead, and resulting in additional business growth for BtB without spending the additional time and frustration of getting there. When BtB has their initial call or meeting with the confirmed lead, they already have enough information about BtB and have shown interest in having the conversation. In the process Randolph Sterling also weeds out prospects that do not fit BtB’s ideal client profile.

What our client has to say …

We have found that working with Randolph Sterling has helped us organize and formalize our business process, both staff members Lisa and Jolene have been able to represent BtB as well as an employee of the company; we consider them an extension of our company. In the 2 ½ years of working with Randolph Sterling, we have had numerous opportunities they have followed-up on with positive outcomes including helping us clean up our list of prospects. The staff at Randolph Sterling are always bringing fresh ideas to the table and helping us think outside the box!

Chris Burke, President, BtB Marketing Communications

 

Case Study: Two Reps from One Company Compete for the Same Prospect

10.04.2011

One of the ways we see a difficulty in changing is when companies get ready to bring us on to implement sales processes. Usually, they have determined a while ago that they need to develop a better process. A telltale sign of this is that as the company grew, they did what we call “throwing money at a problem.” Usually this means that they hired more salespeople to feed off of the growth but didn’t really change the process so they ended up treating twenty salespeople the same way they treated five. They know this is an issue, but oftentimes they are just not ready to pull the trigger yet.

The hardest part of change is taking the first step. Why? Usually for fear of what doing things differently will mean to the status quo. It seems like it is working so why change it?

One of our clients was right in this position. We had confirmed all of the factors we look for in determining when to close a sale with the exception of one, when they were ready to implement a solution (if you do not know the four things we look for, stop reading this now and call us to have us help you) . They saw the problem but didn’t sign on the dotted line until two of their sales reps both showed up for meetings with the same prospect at the same time!

To me, this showed several problems, all of which we helped them solve:

  1. Territory management—there were no defined lines determining who should be calling on this account.
  2. No CRM or management of their CRM to make sure reps weren’t calling on the same accounts.
  3. They both scheduled meetings at the same time so the prospect (putting aside their own scheduling issues) thought he was scheduling a meeting with two different companies! These two reps were competing against each other (not to mention other companies) for the business!

This company grew so quickly that it didn’t take the proper steps to grow properly with the increase in business. The fist fight that almost occurred in their prospect’s office was enough for this company to realize that they had to change, so they hired us to help. We were able to come in and set policy, including who calls on what prospects, how a rep can check to see if a “new” prospect for him is actually being called on by another person in the company, and, most importantly, making sure that the message going out is the same for all salespeople so they don’t end up competing against their own company for business.

What will be your “final straw” to decide to implement change?